There’s no question things have been tough lately, psychologically at least as much as financially. Bad companies are seeing their stocks destroyed, and even good companies’ stocks are getting punished. For those of you in need of a glimmer of hope, we’ve got one for you today … water utility stocks don’t stink right now. They’re actually up for the week, the last two weeks, the last four weeks, and the last six months. It may not be sexy or cutting-edge, but it’s better than losses.

The chart below is the Dow Jones Water Index. The recent recovery effort has certainly been more volatile than the move lower was, but beggars can’t be choosers.

Just so you know, the Dow Jones niche indices (and water is one of them) include almost all listed stocks in the industry according to SIC codes. However, it still may be worth breaking the group down into small and mid cap segments. Sooo…

The next chart is of the S&P Mid Cap Water Index, and then the S&P Small Cap Water Index. Clearly it’s the mid and large caps doing the heavy work here, as the small caps in the group have actually moved mostly lower.

Some of the more prominent large cap and mid cap water utility names are American States Water (AWR), California Water Group (CWT), SJW Corp. (SJW), Aqua America (WTR), and American Water Works (AWK).

Based on the charts above, one would think the all the big shining stars in the industry would be lending a helping hand. However, only California Water and Aqua America are actually making any progress. The other three stocks are drags. That’s a little unusual, but not unheard of. Needless to say, that makes those two stocks at least a little more attractive than others in this group.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

The newsletter/op-ed piece we published earlier this week (”Obama Versus Buffett in Detroit“) generated tons of feedback. Most of it was positive; some of it was not. We’re fine either way, as our whole point was to spur thought and discussion. Some of the feedback is below. We’ve also included our response to the individuals who sent the responses in.

The first reader wrote it…

“Quite to the contrary, if Obama doesn’t choose “dissenting” views for his advisors and listen (hear and understand) to them, he is doomed to failure. (I am not an Obama supporter, but I want to support the President of the USA)”

Good point.

“For all those many years gm made a profit and the govt collected  AND has paid so many (they used to say how goes gm  how goes the country)—now that no one dependant on finance can make a profit in this most horrible economic environment idiot politicians and reporters want  to take this former cash cow for so many and for  so long and shoot  it because the cow  is  sick and  temporarily unable to give milk in dire need of help to survive– if we  want to prevent  a depression we must  do the right thing and help the GM cow get on its feet again–not only for their sake but for our sake also as it is the only RIGHT  thing a great country  would do.”

Agreed. We took a lot of heat based on this basic assumption, but just to be clear….we don’t want GM to fail. We just want it to be fixed right. (There’s a whole lot more below on the same topic.)

I am deeply offended by this editorial, which is not accurate. 
 
Why emphasize what Buffet is saying.  He is not right and you are both wrong on your “facts”  The auto industry is not as “simple” to understand as you think.  Learn a little bit about foreign trade and the role the auto industry plays in it, and the survival of foreign companies because of American involvement, and because of trading agreements, and you will change your mind (I would hope!).
 
The truth is: CIO union manages the health care benefits for hourly workers, and the retired employees are managing and will private-pay their own health care as of 1/1/09.
 
(Previously, GM and other auto companies contributed to part of the cost, which allowed a more reasonable premium rate for employees from some of the largest insurance companies, such as Aetna, Prudential, and Blue-Cross Blue-Shield.) This was part of the employee benefits package negotiated by the union.
 
No, of course you wouldn’t suggest that GM pensioners be thrown under the bus, but that is exactly what could happen if GM and other automakers go into bankruptcy.  The pension wasn’t a gift - because employees contributed, too!  This would be horrible!
 
Obviously, YOU DON”T CARE!…..AND YOU THINK THEY SHOULD FAIL!

Hundreds of thousands of people would be forced to go into the welfare system, since Social security benefits would not even begin to cover the basic costs of living, 

We’re sorry if you were offended by any of our ideas. We won’t apologize for them, since our job is to present them - good or bad. However, we certainly don’t wish to upset a reader.

That said, it’s clear you’re passionate about the topic. We respect that. However, your passion may have led you to a conclusion we weren’t making.

We’re not advocating GM’s bankruptcy - we’re advocating GM’s self-sufficiency. However that can happen is what we support. But, we can’t advocate throwing $25 to $50 billion at Detroit’s big three without a specific plan.

The Treasury drummed up $700 billion a couple of weeks ago to stave of a meltdown in the financial sector, but only recently have we figured out they (the government) still don’t really have a plan to fix the problem…. they’re flying by the seat of their pants. That’s how things get misappropriated, and that’s where fiscal irresponsibility is bred. To see it possibly happening now with the auto industry is worrisome. That’s all.

So, our issue isn’t the money or the industry - our issue is sending money without a plan, or conditions. If the company can’t support itself in the long run (not the short run, but the long run), then something needs to change so that they can.

Maybe GM can be self-sufficient in the long run. We hope so. Letting retirees shoulder some of the health care costs rather than being paid by the company is a good start, though not quite enough.

To be clear though, the employees (current and former) are our primary concern. Like you said, they’ve contributed as much or more than anybody. We agree, which is why we specifically said in the newsletter “In our opinion, the pension and health coverage should be protected by the government”.

In response to your belief, no, we DO care, and we DON’T want them to fail. We just want them to be autonomous, which is better for everyone ultimately. Mentioning the Deutsche Bank target of $0 was mostly a commentary on the stock, not the people in the company.

G M and engineering crew has no imagination.
 
They set on their fat cat butts and let every country that makes a car build them with people in mind, while they continued with huge, heavy monstrous gas guzzlers with 300 to 600 horse power engines.
 
Now needing a complete building of their plants to produce an economical car and still too ignorant to understand where they went wrong.
 
Even now when they build a hybrid its a 6000 pound monster, that will only  get 20 to 25 miles to the gallon of gas and cost 35 to 40 thousand dollars.
 
They proved over and over again, they are simply in the wrong business.
 
Ignorance is bliss, but it wont sell autos or trucks.
 
They biggest line for their truck is, it gets 20 miles to the gallon.

Thanks for the e-mail. We can’t verify the stats and specs cited above, but we definitely get the idea.

good article…well balanced…

Thanks

I think you are right on target.
 
Thank you

Clearly it’s a topic people are passionate about, one way or another. If you’ve got two cents (or more) to add, feel free to do so below.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

Perhaps you came across the news yesterday regarding Japan’s carbon emissions and greenhouse gas production last year? In a nutshell, carbon emissions were up 2.3%…a clear step in the wrong direction of reducing their output of carbon dioxide (CO2). All told, Japan produced 1.37 billion tons worth of CO2, or its equivalent, last year…a record they aren’t exactly proud of.

Japan voluntarily entered the Kyoto pact, which essentially limits the amount of pollution each pact participant is allowed to generate. And, the country’s government thought they could come in under their quota when the pact was first signed. In fact, they were fully expecting a decrease in carbon emissions, which they had managed to do the year before. However, an earthquake led to the shutdown of a key nuclear power plant (TEPCO), so the country fired up their coal power plants. Their CO2 output increased accordingly.

There’s still no word on when or if the nuclear plant will be operational again, so the reprised problem is also an indefinite one.

It’s worth mentioning that - in an effort to abide by the Kyoto pact - Japan is looking to push their carbon output levels to less than 1990’s levels by the end of 2012. That will require almost a 10% reduction of CO2 output every year until then though. So, it’s not unreasonable to think the goal is out of reach, considering the latest batch of data.

What’s this got to do with China Energy Recovery (CGYV)? Nothing, directly. Indirectly it has everything to do with China Energy Recovery.

Considering China Energy Recovery’s (or CER’s) specialty is making coal power cleaner and more efficient, Japan’s solution is a no-brainer… buy some of CER’s caps and boilers. The cost is a pittance compared to the benefit.

One discouraging announcement itself (like this one) doesn’t put money in CER’s pocket. And, just because the solution to the problem is clear doesn’t mean Japan is going to place an order for the equipment that clearly could solve the problem. However, the fact that the problem is so well defined - coupled with the fact that the pressure is on - certainly speaks to the kind of demand CER should enjoy over the next 3 to 5 years. See, Japan is hardly alone here….China’s got a similar challenge, as do many countries including the U.S. (which does not participate in the Kyoto pact).

Carbon emission restrictions are not going away, nor is coal power. One way or another, the world’s got to find a way to make them work together….which is precisely what CER does.

We’re generally not into this kind of ‘concept’ investing, since it doesn’t define a specific valuation. However, CER has provided a clear valuation along with a brilliant product/service concept. That’s why we remain so encouraged.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

Since we’ve immersed ourselves in the matter - and since the cellulose/grain ethanol argument isn’t going away - it may be worth spelling out the pros and cons of each form of ethanol production, so we can identify which companies stand to win or lose.

Ethanol isn’t new. More than 6 million automobiles in the United States are ‘flexfuel’ vehicles, which can use regular gasoline or ethanol. So, there’s no more experimentation that needs to be done to prove ethanol’s viability. The issue (as it always eventually is) is expense. What does it cost, and what will it cost to deploy on a large scale?

In its early stages in the U.S., the question was irrelevant - all ethanol ultimately came from corn….the ‘grain’ ethanol variety. In South America, their ethanol comes from sugar cane, and is equally viable. The decision of which plant to use largely comes from availability - there’s lots of corn here, and there’s lots of sugar cane there.

Only recently has the base-ingredient debate been stirred up, as the production technology has advanced to the point where cellulose materials (like sugar cane) work just as well as grains (like corn) when creating ethanol. So, at this point, ethanol can be extracted from pretty much any plant. Even wood can be used to generate ethanol, since it’s cellulose. However, wood has been tougher to work with so far.

Now, we wanted to make that distinction so we could make these points….

• Cellulose-based ethanol can be derived from any plant, including grass, as well as animal waste. Therefore, it doesn’t consume plants that can be eaten.
• The ethanol created from cellulose is exactly the same as the ethanol created from grain.
• Cellulose-based ethanol is potentially more efficient to produce than grain-based ethanol. Grain ethanol requires the consumption of natural gas, while cellulose ethanol can be created chemically.
• More than 25% of the United States’ corn is used to create ethanol.

What about efficiency? There’s been a long debate regarding whether any grain ethanol was ‘worth it’; early production actually required more BTU input than the ethanol put back out. So, energy was actually lost.

Now, however, there’s a slight energy gain….1.5 units of energy are created for every one unit of energy consumed in the process. More than that, there’s a major net gain in terms of petroleum used to generate grain ethanol. For each gallon of petroleum consumed in the process, 13 gallons of ethanol are produced.

The net energy gain from cellulose ethanol will soon be even better. Input costs wll be even lower too; grass and waste are obviously cheaper than corn.

Though corn ethanol makes up the majority of the industry, longer-term, cellulose ethanol makes the most fiscal and social sense. So, companies relying on corn ethanol alone may be running into a headwind in the near future. These may include agricultural giants like Archer Daniels Midland (ADM), who have enjoyed great financial success recently, but only because of expensive corn.

Bigger picture, as cellulose-based ethanol makes ethanol more attractive in general, auto manufacturers who offer no flexfuel vehicles will likely see diminished demand. U.S. automakers are particularly vulnerable. However, the liability may take years to fully materialize.

The potential beneficiaries of ethanol’s growth could be oddball names like Diversa (DVSA), which produces the enzymes needed to create cellulose ethanol. Or, SunOpta (STKL) may find their ethanol production facility is a profitable one, and decide to expand the business.

It’s not just off-the-radar companies that could benefit though. Mainstream players such as DuPont (DD) are also positioned properly to profit from ethanol and its growing need for infrastructure.

If you have other stats, figures, or companies related to ethanol’s advent, please add them below. We’ll be adding our own thoughts and ideas as the industry/trend develops.

Did you know there are opinions and comments that don’t appear in the blog? To get everything we’ve got to say, you should be signed up for the e-mail version of the newsletter. (Even the newsletter posted on the site doesn’t include everything the e-mail recipients get.) If you’re not on the list, you’re missing out on some great money-making and money-saving ideas. Subscribe today.

Since we’ve adopted a clean energy investing focus here at the Micro Cap Press, we thought it would be fitting to keep you abreast of the latest developments in the arena… even if not associated with a particular investment (i.e. a micro cap stock). If the technology is viable, a publicly-traded player will surface eventually. Anyway, the latest technological advance in harnessing solar power is…..plastics that absorb the sun’s infrared energy.

You may recall we specified the two most common forms of solar energy back on July 10th… photovoltaic cells, and solar thermal power. Both of those were based on visible sunlight, either by converting it directly into electricity using a silicon panel, or using sunlight’s heat to spin a steam-powered turbine. Both technologies work, and are in use already.

The idea of plastics that absorb and use infrared energy, however, is something new altogether. Both photovoltaic and solar thermal power generation require the sun not be obstructed by clouds…which is entirely out of our control. Infrared rays can make their way through cloud cover, meaning the energy can basically be received from sun-rise to sun-down no matter what the weather is like.

The technology is quite new, and as such we know little about it. Here’s what we do know though…

• It’s believed this technology could be five times more effective than current solar power collection
• The plastic is easy to work with, and can simply be applied like paint
• The technology could allow up to 30% of the sun’s total power to be collected, as compared to just 6% with the current means of harnessing it

We’d like to thank a reader for bringing the idea to our attention. However (and more importantly) we’d like to solicit your help in adding to the discussion. Are there publicly-traded companies in the field? Has anybody monetized the technology yet? Is there something we’re missing? You can add any comments using the form below.

Regardless, we suspect we’ll be revisiting the technology’s advancement from time to time.

By the way, here’s a stunning fact that came with the story….the amount of the sun’s total energy that actually hits the earth is 10,000 times greater than the amount of energy mankind uses. Seems like such a waste.

Did you know there are opinions and comments that don’t appear in the blog? To get everything we’ve got to say, you should be signed up for the e-mail version of the newsletter. (Even the newsletter posted on the site doesn’t include everything the e-mail recipients get.) If you’re not on the list, you’re missing out on some great money-making and money-saving ideas. Subscribe today.

As we mentioned we would in this morning’s newsletter, we’ve updated our small cap sector/industry ranking study to reflect data as of today. We primarily sorted by two-week performance, but we also wanted to see consistent growth over the two-week, one-week, and even the one-day column….the longer the timeframe, the larger the gain should be. That consistency is the key to longevity.

While many could have predicted energy stocks would be somewhere on the list, most are surprised to see that utility stocks have been not only more bullish, but more reliable. The really interesting part of the research was the overall winner…metal and glass containers. We’ve seen this obscure group lead before - it was also the leader in the September 1st study, before the market imploded. So, we don’t really think its revival is a fluke….there’s something about this group that truly is worth a look.

While energy is on the list, there is one big problem we have with it. It’s up today, and it’s up for the two-week timeframe, but it’s down week-to-date. This leads us to believe the gains are volatility-based rather than momentum-based. Utilities and containers, on the other hand, are making consistent progress. This indicates that longevity is likely. 

Two important notes about this analysis….

1. It only looks at small cap groups; large cap versions of the same ranking scheme may differ
2. This should be an ongoing analysis rather than a one-time look, as things always change

Still, you get the idea - right now, containers and utility stocks seem to be the places to focus, while energy stocks are actually unproven so far.

If you have questions about the ranking methodology, feel free to ask below. We’ve talked about it a couple of different times now, but that doesn’t always mean we get the message across. Since this is important though - particularly right now - it’s better to make sure we’re all on the same page. We’ll be using this process going forward too, so you may as well ask now if you don’t quite see what we’re going for.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

In this weekend’s edition we mentioned we’d use this week to explore many of the market’s and economy’s underpinnings, as they would ultimately determine the health of both. Since we’re seeing the biggest economic relief today coming from the shrinking TED spread, we’ll start with it. Why the big deal? The hefty TED spread is the whole reason banks have stopped lending to each other. But, with the spread starting to fall again, banks are finally trying to make and take loans. In short, credit may be unthawing.

What exactly is the TED spread? The ‘TED’ part is an acronym for effective interest rates on 3-month U.S. Treasuries and 3-month Euro/Dollar currency futures. However, it’s the European LIBOR rate (London Inter-Bank Offered Rate) that’s used as the ’ED’ benchmark rate by many U.S. banks.

But wait a minute - if the ‘ED’ indicates the effective interest rate on Euro/Dollar contracts, what does the LIBOR rate matter? Great question. The answer is, nothing. The TED spread was formerly based on the Euro/Dollar contract; it’s now based on the LIBOR rate. The name/acronym simply never got changed. Since it basically indicates the same idea (the cost to borrow and loan versus the benefit of risk-free interest payments), there was no particular need to cause more confusion by changing the name of the indicator.

Anyway, the LIBOR’s level is obviously of great importance to borrowers and lenders. Like we said, those very same banks lending at the LIBOR rate could alternatively own U.S. Treasury bonds. So, the TED spread is the difference between what it pays to be a risk-free lender (3 month Treasuries) and what it pays to be consumer lender (LIBOR).

If the difference is small, banks don’t mind lending to each other. When the TED spread is high though (thanks to a high LIBOR rate), banks can’t borrow profitably…so they don’t borrow at all. Hence, the recent surge in the TED spread lead to a credit freeze - the high LIBOR rate just meant borrowing was too expensive. Of course, lending banks couldn’t justify making cheap loans to borrowing banks, as there was a real risk of bank failure.

The chart below makes things painfully clear. The credit market froze in mid-September when the TED spread surged to more than 3.0. Since there was little confidence in any banks’ ability to pay a lender back, lenders were charging an arm and a leg (high interest rates) to make a loan to anybody. They essentially priced themselves out of the market.

More recently - as in today - the TED spread is back to a more tolerable 3.08, down 54 basis points. That’s not terribly close to the longer-term norm of just above 1.0, but it certainly feels better than the recent peak of 4.6 (on 10/10/08). Note that the chart below doesn’t indicate today’s changes; it’s ‘as of’ Friday.

The key for investors is just understanding that the TED spread won’t have to fall all the way back to 1.0 to turn the credit spigots all the way on again. In fact, in light of everything that’s happened over the last twelve months, it may never even approach 1.0 again. That’s ok though - it just has to be low enough to inspire banks to lend…which they want to do. They don’t make any money otherwise.

Bottom line - today’s a big step in the right direction. Take a look at the chart, then keep reading

We know what else you might be thinking - it seems like banks would be willing to borrow at any LIBOR rate as long as those interest rates were passed along to customers. That’s the problem though…they can’t adequately offset their risk by owning government bonds, and at the same time attract new lending customers. Margins are thin to begin with in the lending business, so a wide TED spread and a higher degree of bad-loan risk (which is what the TED spread ultimately indicates) is just more than borrowers (banks) can justify taking on. If it were one or the other, no problem. Both issues though? That’s just too much to deal with now… in the shadow of sub-prime woes.

It’s a little counter-intuitive, since making loans when the TED spread is high can be wildly lucrative. And, some lenders do indeed find customers….mostly higher-risk customers. Most banks, however, are more worried about the downside (risk) than the upside (profits)…and rightfully so. That’s why the credit market freezes, and that’s why the LIBOR rate goes up - it indicates how risky the credit market seems to lenders at the time.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

You don’t have to actually go to Vancouver, Canada any longer if you were dead-set on trying the company’s newly acquired Bread Garden. Come 2009, you’ll be able to experience the restaurant if you have a layover or a plane change at Vancouver’s airport. The great part for the company is that you’ll be joining the 18 million other people who pass through Vancouver airport every year. That’s a lot of foot traffic.

There aren’t a lot of details yet, other than the square footage, location, and the estimated open date of what will be the twelfth Bread Garden. However, airport restaurants tend to do quite well. A unique concept like a Bread Garden Urban Cafe stands to do even better than average.

In the bigger picture, we find it more than a little interesting that this micro cap company has once again found a way to grow by expanding somewhere there’s not a painful recession. On the contrary - Vancouver is thriving. Presumably anybody traveling to, from, or through Vancouver is also doing reasonably well in terms of consumerism.

A game changer? We won’t go that far. There were already 11 Bread Gardens, and there were a total 53 restaurants in the Spicy Pickle (SPKL) family not counting the new one underway at the Vancouver airport. However, every company-owned unit can have a solid impact on the top and bottom line when it comes to a micro cap company like Spicy Pickle.

More specifically, every company-owned unit means much better (relative) cash flow, as there are less than 20 company-owned stores. The rest are franchises. And, owning a unit rather than franchising it gives the corporation a chance at stronger bottom-line earnings than a franchise might produce.

The stock itself remains a frustration, though we attribute the majority of its weakness to the bear market - not the company’s performance.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

Recession? What recession? Bulletin board company China Energy Growth (CGYV) has done everything they said they would do since we picked the stock about a month ago. Though the market hasn’t cooperated yet in terms of the stock’s price, the company has certainly done their part.

In the middle of September, China Energy Recovery (CER) publicly said they were on pace to do $16 more million in business by the end of calendar 2008. That would mean total sales of $26 million for the fiscal year….and a 119% improvement on 2007’s total.

Since September, they’ve done nothing but validate their claim. We covered the news of their $3.2 million installation for Two Lions Fine Chemical Co. a couple of weeks ago. More recently, they collected $735K for a system installed at a Chinese paper mill. What was interesting about the paper mill installation, however, was that it not only improved the energy efficiency of the plant, but also prevented a great deal pollution. The system is capable of re-collecting up to 160 tons of the toxic by-product created when making paper. Some of it can be re-used, and the rest of it can be disposed of appropriately. Neither was being done very well before China Energy solved the problem.

The bigger observation is simply that CER is able to adapt their technology to meet a variety of needs. Though our focus (and theirs) has been energy efficiency through waste-heat recovery, there’s no less opportunity in pollution control. Perhaps we’ll be seeing more projects like this in the future, in addition to their heat recovery boiler systems. 

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

Thanks for all the responses to Monday’s newsletter “Jim Cramer Said What?” Most everyone agreed, or at least understood our point. Some people think we mis-assessed his statement….though we’re still confident in our thoughts. Either way, it was a fruitful (and fun) exercise.

We wanted to post some of the responses here in the blog to show the full range of our reader’s thoughts. Like we said, some agreed, and some didn’t. Our only goal is to foster the discussion so we can all learn something… even if we only learn how to get a better handle on Cramer’s thoughts and words. (As the intro credits to the X-Files said, “The truth is out there.” We’ll see if we can find it.)

Anyway, here’s one note from a reader who works in the industry…

What Jim Cramer apparently does NOT realize is that because of his show on CNBC and it’s popularity, he has developed a “call” into the people. People being any and every person who watches his show. For someone like me, a twenty one year securities industry veteran, I know when to discount the exuberance of Jim’s theatrics. He does openly tell his viewers that one of his shows objectives is to entertain. For a great many everyday people who get a good portion of their investment advice from cable TV and they unfortunately rushed to sell, well … Jim should deliver his message, but he has to weigh his words more carefully. Having a call into someone can be fleeting. In my world; two things, your word is your bond and you’re only as good as your last trade. Thanks.

Thank you. That was pretty much our point too. It’s not that he was just throwing darts, hoping he got lucky. Nor was he being insincere - we respect the fact that he’s decisive, passionate and to the point. Our concern was your concern…. he needs to be extremely careful with his words because people listen and respond to what he says. The problem is, they do it without considering their actual bigger picture, or without remembering that Jim’s got caffeine for blood.

Another reader wrote in….

I believe you took his comments totally out of context. When he said to take out what you need for 5 years he was referring to those who couldn’t sleep at night worrying about their investments. Having cash in the bank to make sure you can cover your critical investments like education for your kids etc isn’t a bad plan for anyone. If you listened to what he said Friday he said we should start dipping back into the market with certain stocks if you had the stomach for it Monday morning. Which I did and made a real nice profit of over 20% on both my energy buys. Like you said he is an entertainer and the FRO I bought this morning, another Crammer pick, did well today. I wonder where the market would be if the government had listened to him months ago about where we were going. I believe you have to take what every supposed stock picks including yours with a grain of salt. He certainly hasn’t been perfect and if we were. we would be down in ARUBA sucking in the good life and laughing about the poor saps in the world trying to make a buck in the market. I’ve gained and lost on his ideas but in the end I hold myself accountable for my investment not you or him.

Hmmm. Just to be clear to all other readers, our goal was mostly to defend Jim’s sense of urgency and extremism - and perhaps his poor choice of words - rather than to crucify him. So, we don’t think we took him out of context; we just wanted to take a bit of the edge off his words “please take it out of the stock market right now, this week.”. (Of course, what we aimed to do and what we may have actually accomplished could have been two different things though.) We even went on to say later in the piece that Cramer qualified the drastic advice by telling long-termers that they should ride it out if they had the stomach for it. That was mostly to defend Jim, since the media down-played that portion of the interview. We’re not sure if that clarifies anything for anyone, but….

Anyway, you hit the nail on the head. All stock trades are ultimately your responsibility (and that even includes our picks). Too often when a trader gets a pick from a Jim Cramer and makes good money with it, that trader is a genius. When that same investor gets a bad pick from Jim Cramer and loses money with it, then Jim Cramer’s the idiot. You can’t have it both ways. Once you can get to that level of honesty with yourself, your trading results tend to improve. Glad you’re there.

And one last reader comment….

I started watching Cramer since “DEEP” had its IPO. I worked there and was interested in what he had to say. After listening to him a couple of times bragging on how “DEEP” was going to make everyone a lot of money, I knew he did not put much research into what he predicts. I never bought any of “DEEP” stock. Though I am sure he is a nice man with a lot more money than me, in my opinion he is an idiot in finance. Anyone that watches him must take what he says with a grain of salt.

You mean he’s not actually intimately aware of 3000 publicly-traded companies? You’re right - a grain of salt is a much-needed ingredient.

Thanks for all the feedback If you’ve got more, you can leave it below.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

It’s not micro-cap specific, but the idea could certainly have an impact for a small cap company with big goals. To date, nearly all wind farms - the clustering of wind turbines used to generate electricity - have been land-based. However, since real estate’s not getting any cheaper or more abundant, the ‘next big thing’ in alternative energy is taking wind farms out to sea… literally.

Hunter Armistead certainly isn’t a household name, but when it comes to getting energy ventures up-and-running he’s no newbie. His latest project is building a wind farm twelve miles off the coast of Australia.

The math makes sense to the investing community too. The cost to build a power-generating windmill is between 50% to 70% greater than the cost to construct comparable, conventional systems. However, the revenue potential for offshore wind systems is at least 70% greater than current solutions. Armistead believes the massive flotillas will pay for themselves in less than ten years. After that, the only expenses will be maintenance and routine replacement…which won’t be cheap, but it won’t be any more expensive than maintaining the current equipment in use by a wind farm’s competition.

Fortunately for investors, the idea isn’t an unproven one. Europe generates about 1100 MW in electricity with offshore windfarms. So, Armistead isn’t trying to break new ground.

Even better for North American investors is how the U.S. has lagged the rest of the world when it comes to wind power…. we’re trying to play ’catch up’ now. The first deal has already been signed, for a wind power system in Delaware. Delmarva Power - a division of Pepco (POM) - will start building an offshore system soon. Rhode Island is following in those footsteps, and New York is rumored to be getting on board as well. The East Coast is ideal for such projects, as the ocean is relatively shallow for many miles out. That lets the developers properly anchor the windmills.

However, the East Coast isn’t the only market. A Texas project costing $600 million will provide 283 MW of power….about 1/4 of all the wind power electricity in all of Europe right now.

All told, the United States could ramp up wind-based electricity from its current 1% of our total energy consumption to as much as 20% of our total consumption. That will require a lot of hardware and technology though, which is where we feel the investment opportunity lies.

Currently, major companies like General Electric (GE) and utility companies like Florida Light & Power (FPL) seem to be the key players with a role in the industry’s future. GE makes the turbines used by the windmills, while FPL is working on a wide scale project to roll out the technology. However, the odds are good that smaller companies will become a factor as wind power proliferates.

In fact, we looked at a few of those companies not that long ago in “The Problem With Investing in Wind Power“. You may want to re-read it to see which of them are emerging as undiscovered key players.

In any case, it looks like the wind power infrastructure is headed offshore. Companies that can make doing so easier, faster, or cheaper stand to do well.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

It was only a small mention in a relatively minor article found at MarketWatch.com, but Lily Donge was recently quoted saying she felt that no matter who won the Presidential election this year, a carbon-emissions cap and regulated trading of carbon credits would be introduced when Congress reconvened after the new Commander-in-Chief was in office. (By the way, Donge is the manager of environment and climate change at the ’socially responsible’ investment firm Calvert Group.)

There’s an implication for China Energy Recovery (CGYV) if Donge’s statement was accurate (and we believe it was).

A couple of weeks ago we were explaining how the sale of carbon emission credits was a sub-industry in itself for China’s industries, as the revenue it could generate was significant. China-based CGYV customer Two Lions Fine Chemical Co. sold $2.5 million worth of carbon credits thanks to a waste-heat recovery system that only cost them about $3.0 million…and they’ll be able to sell those credits year in, and year out.

However, that was in China, where a carbon cap system is in place. In the United States there is effectively (and surprisingly) no comparable system… yet. The clamoring for such a framework is growing though, and will likely become law in 2009. When it does, and when trading carbon credits is demonstrated not to be a free-for-all, we absolutely believe U.S. companies will start looking for ways to at least not exceed their carbon-output allotment. Furthermore, we expect these same companies to follow the lead of Two Lions and other factories, and sell their carbon credits for a profit.

Another industry expert quoted in the article specifically said waste-heat recovery was an interesting arena, and would benefit from Congress taking such an action.

The point is, the ideas we’ve been discussing regarding China Energy Recovery aren’t just ours - they’re being batted around more and more each day by the mainstream media. While the stock itself has been a frustration lately, it’s certainly not because the premise is faulty. Indeed, CGYV’s premise is ideal. Now we just need the broad market to cooperate.

Here’e MarketWatch.com’s alternative energy article.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

With all eyes focused on either the Presidential election or the Wall Street/Washington fiasco’s downgrade from bad to worse, there’s actually a huge opportunity for alternative energy investors. The ridiculous amount of pork-barrel spending not withstanding ($6 million for wooden arrows? Seriously?), also buried in the bill was some much-needed support - in the form of subsidies - for wind and solar power. It wasn’t clear if any of these industries had much of a future, as they all still need fiscal help to get them to the point of viability. Now, however, investors in these companies can have a little more confidence. That’s good news too, as these arenas really do have some compelling small and micro cap companies.

Here are the basics of the bill….

• Solar power - any company that is involved in the production of solar power will now be granted tax credits for another eight years
• Wind power - wind energy companies will only get one more year of tax credits
• Utility companies - traditional utility companies are now eligible for tax credits to the extent they start to develop wind and solar infrastructure, with the same timeframes mentioned above

It’s not global salvation though, so it’s not like solar panel stocks are going to be overnight sensations again.

While the U.S. is now on board with further development of these technologies (perhaps without even knowing it), other nations are still wrestling with whether or not their subsidies can be justified. Spain is one of the more noteworthy retractors of financial help. A year ago the country had been one of the biggest consumers of solar power technology, but the cancellation of their subsidy program sent a troubling shockwave throughout the entire solar panel industry.

Still, eight years should be adequate enough for solar power to proliferate, and get cheap enough to be viable here in the U.S.. Wind power? Well, one year may not get the same job done. That’s unfortunate too, as there are some very promising wind power stocks. That being said, don’t blindly assume every wind power company needs a subsidy to survive now.

The most compelling part of the legislation, however, is that major utilities can now venture into the alternative energies without paying for everything out of pocket. In a sense that’s bad news for the small players solely focused on wind or solar power, as a bigger utility company may be able to get their alternative energy technology and infrastructure in place before a smaller upstart can. On the other hand, those big utility companies are well behind the small guys when it comes to the technology; they may be coming to the smaller outfits to acquire their technology, or the company altogether.

Anyway, we just didn’t want you to miss the good news in the midst of the melee.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

We love getting questions from our readers. Though we may only get one question on a topic, odds are many of you are wondering the same thing. If answering it gives all of us an opportunity to learn something and become better investors for it, we like to answer them in a public forum like this one.

In any case, a reader writes…

What’s an 8K?

Great question. Each paper filing a publicly-traded company submits to the SEC (Securities Exchange Commission) is completed on a specific form. The most common ones we all see are the 10Q, for quarterly reports (income statement, balance sheet, and cash flow), and a 10K for annual reports (also for income statements, balance sheets, and cash flow). However, those aren’t the only forms a company frequently uses. Another often-used form is the 8K.

The 8K, however, is a little more ‘free form’ in spirit. While 10Q’s and 10K’s specifically require the financial statements and corresponding verbal descriptions for financial performance, the 8K is a report of anything considered to be ‘material’ to shareholders. Sometimes it might be a description of dilutive financing, or perhaps the awarding of a big contract. We’ve even seen legal actions (for or against a company) show up on an 8K form. So, to answer your question….

An 8K is an SEC filing that’s not topic-specific, but shares information about something that should be disclosed to the public - simply as a matter of record.

Not everything shows up on an 8K form, but most important things do. And yes, what some companies consider to be 8K worthy may be something that doesn’t seem 8K worthy to another company. So, don’t expect absolute 8K uniformity for all stocks. Still, they’re an important part of the overall puzzle.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

While most stocks - and broad indices - were just mediocre last week, there were a few small cap industries with an unusually strong performance from their stocks. In some cases it may have been a coincidence or fluke. In other cases though, there may be more to the story. Here they are:

(Note that energy stocks have been removed, as they are largely moving in tandem with oil prices right now. Also, we’ve specifically focused on small cap stocks; you may not see quite the same leadership from the same large cap industry.)

See any interesting themes? Retail - in one form or another - appeared on the leader list in a couple of different ways. We also saw containers and packaging stocks lead the pack. In both cases there’s some overlap, but also in both cases each index has unique constituents. Translation: You may want to get specific here if you go drilling for underlying stock picks.

On a more philosophical note, how obscure can you get? Containers? Wow. As for apparel and specialty retailers, they’re a little more recognizable.

Either way, the opportunity here is finding a pick nobody else has really thought of yet…or one most people haven’t thought of yet anyway. These industries and their results are probably buried deep in their respective sector, and may not have an evident impact anyone has recognized. As such, you may still be able to find an early entry point (before anybody else does) into a good trend. 

We’ll get you started with a list of small cap specialty retailers. Notice that some of them are tiny, and could present liquidity problems. Still, if it’s an opportunity, then it is what it is. Obviously more due diligence is needed, but stocks that are actually moving may deserve a closer look than others.

Not that we’ve done any homework on ‘em, but Borders (BGP), MarineMax (HZO), Kirkland’s (KIRK), Pier 1 (PIR), and West Marine (WMAR) seem to have the more attractive charts right now.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

Of course, ‘dominate’ can be a relative term. Last week, ‘domination’ mean scraping by with a small gain while the other indices took fairly sizable losses. Over the course of weeks though, yeah, small cap stocks and value stocks (or the combo of both) have been great performers.

It all goes back to our July 3rd mid-year update, which also included some specific forecasts of style and market cap rotation. We were looking for value to topple growth as a market leader, and specifically, we were expecting large cap value to come roaring back while mid cap growth took the biggest hit. We updated the forecast on August 11th. Though nothing significant had changed, small caps were leading the way at the time… which we also turned a little more optimistic about.

So, with two months under our belt, how do things stack up now? More of the same; score one for rotation strategies. Take a look:

It was a value trifecta last week…mid, small, then large caps. Growth was not as strong - each growth/market cap lost a little ground.

But, that was just one week… a tepid one at that. The true trend is more evident with a slightly longer time frame. In this case, we’re more interested in the last month, and the last two months. On our chart, the two ‘winners’ for each time frame are highlighted in green, while the two losers are highlighted in orange.

Small caps anyone? Take your pick of style - growth and value have both been great. Though we don’t want to detract from our original bullish bias for mid cap value, based on the rotation we’ve seen in the meantime, we do indeed favor small caps now as well.

And growth? Well, the numbers don’t lie. Large cap and mid cap growth stocks have lagged, or lost ground, if not both. That was what we were warning you about in early July.

Several of you have asked how to make this rotation forecast actionable in your portfolio. While that’s largely up to you, a good starting point might be to narrow your search to stocks that fit within these groups. You won’t likely see a ‘night and day’ difference. However, if you can squeeze out a few extra percentage points thanks to some group-based help, it’s worth it.

If you’re a little more straight-forward, the next-easiest choice is market cap and style-based ETFs. The Rydex Fund company may have the simplest solution; they offer an exchange-traded fund designed to mirror the six indices we’re basing our analysis on….

• S&P 500 Pure Value (RPV)
• S&P 500 Pure Growth (RPG)
• S&P MidCap 400 Pure Value (RFV)
• S&P MidCap 400 Pure Growth (RFG)
• S&P SmallCap 600 Pure Value (RZV)
• S&P SmallCap Pure Growth (RZG)

If you wanted to add a layer of complexity, you could also utilize the inverse versions of these ETFs….ETFs that move upward when the underlying index moves lower. Obviously those instruments can’t be held forever, but they’re a nice way to keep making gains in a bearish environment. If that’s up your alley, Proshares offers..

• ProShares Short QQQ ETF (PSQ)
• ProShares Short S&P500 ETF (SH)
• ProShares Short MidCap400 ETF (MYY)
• ProShares Short Dow30 ETF (DOG)
• ProShares Short Russell2000 ETF (RWM)
• ProShares Short SmallCap600 ETF (SBB)

We could mention leveraged funds, but we’ll save that for another time. In the meantime, if you would like to cash in on our next style/cap forecast, make sure you’re signed up to receive our e-mail newsletter.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

Though the overall market has been volatile the last several days, the net gain has basically been nil. And, there’s a good chance things could stay choppy-yet-stale for a while longer. That doesn’t mean there haven’t been any stocks that are making nice moves though.

Here’s a list of the bulletin board stocks that have managed to overcome general market weakness and continue their march upward. If you’re looking for a small cap trading idea, you may want to start with these:

Biotime (BTIM) - Trading as low as 26¢ early in the year, Biotime’s move to the current price of 94¢ is impressive. Yet, the rally hasn’t sped out of control. We think the stock could continue to keep gaining momentum in the near future.

United Fuel & Energy (UFEN) - This stock really hasn’t been all that impressive over the last 12 months or so. But, things have changed quite a bit since July when it managed to stave off further losses. During that time, we started to see pretty strong buying volume as well. The stock hasn’t yet broken out, but it looks like it may be gearing up to do so.

Micromem Tech (MMTIF) - Micromem has had a pretty tough 2008, peaking at $2.50 and then sliding all the way back down to under $1.00. The last couple of weeks, however, have been different - the stock is perking up at least a little. There’s still an intermediate-term resistance line to contend with; right now it’s somewhere around $1.60. Micromem is still worth keeping an eye on though.

XO Holdings (XOHO) - This is strictly a long-term idea, born from the fact that the stock is coming out of a long-term downtrend. For the first time in nearly a year we’re starting to see more bullish volume than bearish volume, and we’re starting to see higher highs and higher lows rather than lower highs in lower lows.

Deep Down Incorporated (DPDW) - Deep Down Incorporated shares have been range bound between 44¢ and $1.22 since December of last year. The only bullish attraction at this point is the recent push off of that support at 44¢. Strictly a trade, but a good one.

MSGI Security (MSGI) - MSGI spent the latter portion of last year and the early portion of this year sinking from a high above $1.75 to a low below 50¢. Since May, however, we’ve seen the stock consolidate. And even more recently, we’ve seen the stock surge on pretty good volume. This may be the early signs of recovery effort.

Global Green Solutions (GGRN) - For one reason or another this stock has come to life in the last month, with some significant volume to boot.

That’s it for now. And, bear in mind these stocks are only on our hot list because of their charts. Odds are that there’s a deeper, underlying reason for the move, but some due diligence from your end is absolutely in order if you want to act on any of these bulletin board ideas.

That being said, if you have something to add - or know of something the rest of us should know regarding any of these stocks - please chime in using the comment form below.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.

Thanks for all the feedback regarding our Las Vegas Sands (LVS) suggestion. So far, pretty much everyone has agreed with the optimistic assessment. However, in an effort to be fair and balanced, we want to put the dissenting opinions on the table too; all intelligent discussions bear fruit of some sort.

One of our readers wrote back…

Thank you for your email, but I must say I disagree with your call for LVS.

With the latest round of US immigration restrictions, it increasingly becomes more difficult for foreigners (Asians in particular) to travel to the US.  This, in addition to the opening of Casinos in Macao, will, unfortunately, further empty the beautiful Sin City.  While I understand that LVS has substantial exposure to Macao (China), one can’t ignore that LAS is its home turf.  The recent recession in the US has further demonstrated that LAS is feeling the recession, and will continue to do so for the next 2 years, if it is to depend solely on the national consumer …checkmate.

While I will still be checking into LAS for the next 2 yrs for leisure purposes, I am checking out of any invesments in the Sin city for a while…

Thanks for the response; many good points there.

Basically, we think everything you said was true except the big one you closed with…”The recent recession in the US has further demonstrated that LAS is feeling the recession, and will continue to do so for the next 2 years”.

That’s the ultimate argument behind our bullishness on LVS…the recession won’t last two more years.

Yes, Vegas has felt a lull…in revenue and earnings. The June numbers (foot traffic and house take) were both down. However, that history in no way reflects what’s likely to be in store for the next two years. We think the recession will be over within two years, one way or another, if it’s not over already. So, we aren’t willing to make the same assumption you are about two more years of weakness for casino stocks.

The reason we don’t make that blind jump? History. If you take a look at the long-term chart of casino stocks, you’ll see they started to recover well before whatever the crisis was at the time came to a close. These stocks are four for four when it comes to rebounding right when things look the worst.

Logical? No, but when’s the market been logical? We’ve seen time and time again how stocks are priced at what people think they’re going to be worth six to twelve months from now. True valuations rarely play a role in ‘buying low and selling high’.

In other words, we’re not waiting for all the planets to line up perfectly…they just need to appear to be headed in that direction. It’s not a sure thing, but waiting for the perfect time to jump in will probably get you in too late.

Are we right? Who knows? Only time will tell; that’s the ‘risk’ side of the risk/reward ratio. In our view, the reward outweighs the risk here.

Another part of the issue has been difficulty getting into the United States (and therefore Vegas) because of immigration restrictions. The bigger part of it, however, we think has to do with expenses…the hotels are ‘cheaper’ to foreigners when the dollar is weak, but air travel costs more than offset that. With oil down big-time lately, getting to Vegas will be easier to justify…for those who can cross the border.

Any other thoughts on Las Vegas Sands, pro or con? Leave ‘em below.

Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.