Japan’s Carbon Emissions Surge - Boy, Do They Need China Energa Recovery
Perhaps you came across the news yesterday regarding Japan’s carbon emissions and greenhouse gas production last year? In a nutshell, carbon emissions were up 2.3%…a clear step in the wrong direction of reducing their output of carbon dioxide (CO2). All told, Japan produced 1.37 billion tons worth of CO2, or its equivalent, last year…a record they aren’t exactly proud of.
Japan voluntarily entered the Kyoto pact, which essentially limits the amount of pollution each pact participant is allowed to generate. And, the country’s government thought they could come in under their quota when the pact was first signed. In fact, they were fully expecting a decrease in carbon emissions, which they had managed to do the year before. However, an earthquake led to the shutdown of a key nuclear power plant (TEPCO), so the country fired up their coal power plants. Their CO2 output increased accordingly.
There’s still no word on when or if the nuclear plant will be operational again, so the reprised problem is also an indefinite one.
It’s worth mentioning that - in an effort to abide by the Kyoto pact - Japan is looking to push their carbon output levels to less than 1990’s levels by the end of 2012. That will require almost a 10% reduction of CO2 output every year until then though. So, it’s not unreasonable to think the goal is out of reach, considering the latest batch of data.
What’s this got to do with China Energy Recovery (CGYV)? Nothing, directly. Indirectly it has everything to do with China Energy Recovery.
Considering China Energy Recovery’s (or CER’s) specialty is making coal power cleaner and more efficient, Japan’s solution is a no-brainer… buy some of CER’s caps and boilers. The cost is a pittance compared to the benefit.
One discouraging announcement itself (like this one) doesn’t put money in CER’s pocket. And, just because the solution to the problem is clear doesn’t mean Japan is going to place an order for the equipment that clearly could solve the problem. However, the fact that the problem is so well defined - coupled with the fact that the pressure is on - certainly speaks to the kind of demand CER should enjoy over the next 3 to 5 years. See, Japan is hardly alone here….China’s got a similar challenge, as do many countries including the U.S. (which does not participate in the Kyoto pact).
Carbon emission restrictions are not going away, nor is coal power. One way or another, the world’s got to find a way to make them work together….which is precisely what CER does.
We’re generally not into this kind of ‘concept’ investing, since it doesn’t define a specific valuation. However, CER has provided a clear valuation along with a brilliant product/service concept. That’s why we remain so encouraged.
Start receiving FREE e-research on select small and micro cap stocks. Get in-depth research reports, comprehensive coverage, exclusive market commentary and more, just by becoming a MCP subscriber today! Look for the submission form at the top of the right-hand column.
2 Comments »
RSS feed for comments on this post.
Leave a comment
Line and paragraph breaks automatic, e-mail address never displayed, HTML allowed: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <code> <em> <i> <strike> <strong>


Yes I did! Sorry to be redundant. Sometimes I’m impatient and double post to get an answer faster. My apologies.
Have you noticed another seller in the stock? I call him the energizer bunny…steady, consistently selling for two weeks now…before the market opens and after it closes as well. At least this seller is being discriminate…Any thoughts? Thanks and I’ll stop double posting here and Smallcap, Sir.
Editor’s response: No no no….you can post as often as you like at both sites, and feel free to be redundant. With a few exceptions like yourself, the two sites have different reader base. So, both crowds may benefit from your questions and our answers. In fact, we somewhat expected some overlap, since both sites are covering the same company.
We normally don’t cover the same companies at both sites, so it’s a rarity to even have the opportunity for overlap. When we do though, we don’t mind hosting and posting the same basic thoughts in both places. Anyway…
I didn’t notice the selling you mentioned, but I can see it now. I see no registered sales on tap or recently filed for restricted shares or insider shares, so it’s not an employee doing it. It might be one of the earliest buyers - those shares are no longer restricted, though I didn’t even see a registered sale filing going back to the beginning of the year. So, we can’t know for sure who it it…. it’s just a big shareholder. (I don’t think it’s any of us either. We’ve sold some at SmallCap, but only a few thousand shares - nowhere near the total that’s been changing hands.) Maybe it’s a money manager or small fund.
Like you said, the seller is discriminate if it’s all just one person. I guess we can thank him for that. But no, we’ve got no more info than you’ve got.
Comment by Lewis — December 17, 2008 @ 10:56 am
What are your thoughts on the new R&D facility?
Editor’s Response: Not a significant victory. It’s not a bad thing, but the facility will play host to a lot of stuff they already knew and were already doing. (Did you ask the same question over at SmallCapNetwork?)
Comment by Lewis — December 8, 2008 @ 1:51 pm